AI
Latest articles and analysis on AI for educators, partners, and policy teams.
Foundation Blogs & Impact Insights
Social Impact Journal
Ethical AI for Vulnerable Populations: Why the System Creates the Vulnerability
Vulnerability to an AI system is created by the relationship between a person and the system, not fixed in the person. What a genuine duty of care to vulnerable users requires.
Social Impact Journal
Designing for the Edge Improves the Centre - Why Inclusive AI Is Not a Trade-Off
Designing AI for vulnerable users is widely assumed to cost quality for everyone else. The evidence shows the opposite - designing for the edge improves the centre.
Social Impact Journal
Children's Digital Safety in the AI Age
Children are increasingly using AI-powered toys, apps, and assistants. Most products fail basic safety standards. Here is what good child safety in AI actually looks like.
Social Impact Journal
How AI Chatbots Fail Children
AI chatbots marketed to children frequently fail safety review. Here are the recurring failure patterns from the Foundation's audit work, and what good looks like.
Social Impact Journal
Privacy by Design for Children's AI Products
Children's AI products often satisfy COPPA and GDPR-K technically while collecting data families would not knowingly accept. Here is what privacy by design actually requires.
AI• May 27
Vulnerability Is Not a Property of the Person - It Is a Property of the Relationship
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
The Same Four-Part Failure — Why AI Fails Every Vulnerable Group the Same Way
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
A Duty of Care Is Not a Consent Screen - What It Actually Requires of an AI System
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
Designing for the Edge Improves the Centre - Why Inclusive AI Is Not a Trade-Off
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
Vulnerability Is Situational - Why It Eventually Concerns Everyone
READ MORE →Categories
Read All Blogs & Impact Insights
Explore our comprehensive library of case studies, offline-first AI tutor playbooks, and rural community empowerment frameworks.
AI• May 27
Ethical AI for Vulnerable Populations: Why the System Creates the Vulnerability
Vulnerability to an AI system is created by the relationship between a person and the system, not fixed in the person. What a genuine duty of care to vulnerable users requires.
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
Vulnerability Is Not a Property of the Person - It Is a Property of the Relationship
Vulnerability to an AI system is created by the relationship between a person and the system. Why that reframing changes who is responsible.
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
The Same Four-Part Failure — Why AI Fails Every Vulnerable Group the Same Way
Across populations as different as children and refugees, AI fails through the same four-part pattern. What it is and why it compounds.
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
A Duty of Care Is Not a Consent Screen - What It Actually Requires of an AI System
A duty of care toward vulnerable AI users is discharged through design, evaluation, deployment, and governance - not through disclaimers or consent screens.
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
Designing for the Edge Improves the Centre - Why Inclusive AI Is Not a Trade-Off
Designing AI for vulnerable users is widely assumed to cost quality for everyone else. The evidence shows the opposite - designing for the edge improves the centre.
READ MORE →
AI• May 27
Vulnerability Is Situational - Why It Eventually Concerns Everyone
Vulnerability to AI systems is often temporary and situational. Illness, crisis, or shock can place anyone into a vulnerable relationship with a system.
READ MORE →
Ready to Empower Communities Together?
Partner with Mobiloitte Foundation to implement digital training programs, health campaigns, and dynamic education centers.
Collaborate with our Foundation→